







|

March 5, 2003.
Majority Leader BILL FRIST,
U.S. Senate, Washington, DC.
DEAR MAJORITY LEADER FRIST: We write you today on the
nomination of Miguel Estrada to the D.C. Circuit of Appeals. We are all
Latino/Hispanic/Chicano professors researching, writing, and teaching
in colleges and universities throughout the country. We come from a
world, not too dissimilar from the other worlds in our society, where
not only are Latinos under represented in our rank of professors, but
we are also under represented among the students and worse yet among
the Presidents and Deans of our institutions. Nevertheless, we believe
in studying old ideas, developing and exchanging new ideas, and
training the next generation of thinkers to explore and improve the
world around them, however they choose to do so.
We have followed with extreme interest the Senate's review
and debate on the nomination of Mr. Estrada. For many in our broader
society, they may be confused as to whether Mr. Estrada should be
supported or not; however, we are not. We stand united in our
opposition to the confirmation of Mr. Estrada to the D.C. Circuit Court
of Appeals.
We recognize and congratulate Mr. Estrada on his
professional accomplishments. So few Hispanics have had the privileges
that he has had to serve as a Supreme Court clerk, to serve in the
Solicitor General's Office of the Department of Justice or to reach the
level of partner at a major law firm in this country. At the end of the
day, however, the question we ask is whether Mr. Estrada would be a
fair judge? We conclude that he would not be.
He evaded questions from the Senate. That does not give us
confidence that he would be a fair and open-minded judge if he feels he
has to hide how he approaches the law. His past record, although
limited, also provides some disturbing insight into how he would rule
as a judge. We see that he would not be a supporter of affirmative
action at the very colleges and universities where we teach where
Latinos are sorely under represented and under served. A major problem
facing Chicanos and other Hispanics is the issue of racial profiling;
again, Mr. Estrada downplays its existence. We question whether he has
a commitment to protecting civil rights of Latinos.
We want more representation from our community in the
courts, but not at such a high price. We accept liberal and
conservative thinkers among us, but Mr. Estrada is much more than a
conservative, he is an ideologue. We cannot support the confirmation of
the ideologue to such an important position in our society. The cost is
too high. We urge you and the members of the Senate to oppose Mr.
Estrada's confirmation.
Sincerely,
|

|